About your Search

20131028
20131105
Search Results 0 to 11 of about 12 (some duplicates have been removed)
're over the website. >> the problem with obama care isn't just the website, it's the whole law. >> the bottom line is the problems with obama care run deeper than just the website. >> the problems go well beyond a flopped website. >> it is clear obama care and flaws are much more than the website. the website is the tip of the iceberg. >> this week republicans smelled blood in president obama's claim no americans would be kicked off their existing plans. >> let me repeat this. nothing in our plan requires you to change what you have. >> and yet as nbc reports a detailed look at the legislation shows that the administration knew that more than 40 to 67% of those in the individual market, or some percentage of 14 million americans, would not be able to keep their existing plans. never mind the fact the new plans will offer more comprehensive coverage and sometimes at a lower price tag, this is clearly the next front in a war on the nation's health care law. >> we know this morning is the president knew that these letters were coming. in the president knew these letters were comin
of this law, correct? why aren't you in the exchange? >> because i'm part of the federal employee health benefits plan. >> why won't you go into the exchange? you're part of this law. you're literally in charge of this law. should you be any different than all of the other americans out there who are losing their health insurance today? >> i'm part of the 95% with affordable, available health coverage as are most of your colleagues. >> most americans -- it isn't available to them. why will you not agree? -- >> i'm not eligible for the exchange because i have coverage in -- >> you could decide to drop your coverage of your employer. you have the choice to decide not to choose -- >> that is not true, sir. >> i chose not to go -- >> members of congress are now part of the exchange thanks to an amendment added by congress -- >> with all due respect -- >> if i have affordable coverage in my workplace, i'm not eligible to go into the marketplace. that's part of the law. >> i would encourage you to be just like the american people and enter the exchange and agree to find a way to do that. >> it
values and the rule of law. fidelity, bravery, integrity. that's your motto. and today we're here to welcome a remarkable new leader for this remarkable institution. one who lives those principles out every single day, mr. jim comey. before i get to jim, i want to thank all the predecessors who are here today. we are grateful for your service. i have to give a special shout out to bob mueller who served longer than he was supposed to, but he was such an extraordinary leader through some of the most difficult times that we've had in national security. i consider him a friend. i'm so grateful for him being here today. thank you very much. [ applause ] >> now, jim has dedicated his life to defending our laws, making sure all americans can trust our justice system to protect their rights and their well-being. he's the grandson of a beat cop. he's the prosecutor who helped bring down the gambinos. he's the relentless attorney who fought to stem the bloody tide of gun violence, rub out white color crime, deliver justice to terrorists. it's just about impossible to find a matter of justi
by fragmented management that saw several government agencies overseeing different parts of the law without a single point person. david cutler, harvard professor and former presidential adviser. they were running the biggest startup in the world and they didn't have anyone who had run a startup or a business. it wasn't only mismanagement that doomd doomed the rollout, fear of republican sabotage and concerns over the 2012 election set the disaster two years before the site launched. "washington post" reports the white house slowed down important regulations that had been drafted months earlier, to wait until just months after president obama's election. medicare's top risk analyst, it was the president's most significant domestic policy achievement and the very aides that pushed the law through congress were risking bad implementation for a short-term political gain. regarding the president's infamous promise if you like it, you can keep it, some white house policy advisers objected to the breadth of keep your plan, they were overruled. in recent days, current aides have downplayed or dism
, republicans are denying or threatening to deny confirmation to any nominees in order to nullify laws, stymy legitimate policymaking and reverse pac, keep liberal judges off one key appellate court in order to conserve its conservative balance for as long as possible. joining me today senior writer for "politico" magazine glen thrush, host of disrupt karen finney and writer from the "washington post" sam stein. wonderful people. thank you for joining me this friday of fridays. glen has more time with these slacky magazine deadlines. >> packed the court. >> we have talked. i think there's new polling out. there's a discussion about both parties being at once hurt by recent sort of scandals, allegations, problems, and gaining ground on other parties because of the problems on the other side of the aisle. this republican wave of obstruction that we saw in and around raising the debt ceiling and reopening the government continues in i think a more insidious way with these nominations. i wonder, glen, harry reid talked about the nuclear option, which is using simple majority to clear nominees. th
's no way physically. >> politically, electorally. >> to reverse the health care law. to say he caved is ridiculous. there's no way it could have happened. ted cruz might have gone to harvard but nobody in his base has even gone to high school civics apparently because they believe what he's telling him and it's not physically possible. >> meantime it's worse, report has crumbled in one year. 63% of women now have an unfavorable view, 46% of senators have unfavorable view, 67% of independents, 70% of white college graduates now have an unfavorable view. to say nothing about black people and hispanics, gays and lesbians. >> in the reality-based community, those who reside in it, those numbers would freak people out. grownups in the republican party should be freaked out by those numbers. when you live in the short-term political -- i don't want to say reality. >> in space where no one can hear you scream. >> ted cruz, senator ted cruz and mike lee and all these other folks on the far right fringe reside, they don't care about numbers. that's a long-term problem. for them the number the
Search Results 0 to 11 of about 12 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)